The Guardian's election coverage [Guardian Unlimited: Election 2005] points to this article by Nick Herbert, one of the shortlist to replace Howard Flight at Arundel and South Downs. The "hot" snippet is this:
"The whisper is that there is a top-secret, extremely clever strategy afoot: go along with spending rises now, but return to a tax-cutting agenda when — if — the party is re-elected. So the repositioning of the Tories is to be based on a lie; a fact that is unlikely to escape the public."
As commentators such as Mathrew Parris have pointed out, hardly anything new here; if you read the whole article it puts the snippet into the context of what probably a majority of Conservative voters think.
What is more interesting is this hardly any different from what Labour did in 1997; expunge the word "redistribution" and publicly commit to stick to the previous Government's spending plans for at least 2 years and not mention all the other juicy plans they had.
Whose fault is it that no one seems to feel they can present their policies in an honest way; the politicians, the media or the voter?
dasBlog theme by Mads Kristensen
Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.