<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Pete Cole's WebLog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/" />
  <link rel="self" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetAtom" />
  <icon>favicon.ico</icon>
  <updated>2010-02-08T15:47:36.5551305+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Peter Cole</name>
  </author>
  <subtitle>Mutterings on things generally </subtitle>
  <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/</id>
  <generator uri="http://dasblog.info/" version="2.3.9074.18820">DasBlog</generator>
  <entry>
    <title>What is content, what is distribution</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/02/08/WhatIsContentWhatIsDistribution.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-02-08T15:47:39+00:00</published>
    <updated>2010-02-08T15:47:36.5551305+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/QObtlwJkwPI/1265325915">Boxee:
We didn't steal anything from Hulu</a>.   
<p>
By <a href="http://www.betanews.com/author/smfulton3">Scott M. Fulton, III</a>, <a href="http://www.betanews.com/">Betanews</a></p><p>
.. Zucker responded: "What Boxee was doing was illegally taking the content that was
on Hulu without any business deal. We have several distributors...of the Hulu content
that we have legal distribution deals with, so we don't preclude distribution deals.
What we preclude are those that illegally take that content."
</p><p>
That accusation before Congress that Boxee violated the law triggered <a href="http://blog.boxee.tv/2010/02/04/boxee-responds-to-nbcs-jeff-zucker/" target="_blank">a
lengthy response late this afternoon</a> from Boxee Founder and CEO Avner Ronen, on
his company's blog: "Boxee uses a web browser to access Hulu's content -- just like
Firefox or Internet Explorer. Boxee users click on a link to Hulu's Web site and the
video within that page plays. We don't 'take' the video. We don't copy it. We don't
put ads on top of it. The video and the ads play like they do on other browsers or
on Hulu Desktop. And it certainly is legal to do so."
</p><p>
The question of whether enabling access to another Web site's video through one's
software is effectively "redistribution," cuts to the heart of the major issue of
contention surrounding the ... <a href="http://www.betanews.com/">Copyright Betanews,
Inc. 2010</a><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bn/~4/QObtlwJkwPI" width="1" height="1" /></p></i> [via <a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/QObtlwJkwPI/1265325915">Betanews</a>]
</blockquote>
        <p>
Surrounding quite a lot in the media world. It seems to me that they are all absolutely
desparate to control the 'frame', not just what is displayed in that frame (which
is the bit they have the rights too). 
</p>
        <p>
This is what the row in the UK about project Canvas is about -- the BBC saying they
are being open and wonderful and generally terrific (I know, I know) and Sky and Virgin
(platform providers) being very suspicious about why the BBC of all organisations
should want to build a platform.
</p>
        <p>
My opinion? Everyone is terrified that in the future (or already) content is worthless,
its only the frame (where the adverts sit) that is monetisable. Certainly in
the UK we need to come to a better settlement or we are stuck in a world of almost
zero viewer competion. Do you really want a world where you can only buy one TV set? 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cracking ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/02/08/Cracking.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-02-08T15:23:13+00:00</published>
    <updated>2010-02-08T15:23:10.535733+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
... idea Grommit
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
            <i>The Turbine Light concept (which is going to be a part of the upcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/greener+gadgets">Greener
Gadgets conference</a> in New York City at the end of this month) harnesses the power
of the wind from cars rushing past to light up the ever-darkening roadways. The turbines
use the wind collected to generate energy for the lighting</i> [via <a href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/mElffjh-0rg/">Engadget</a>]
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
fab idea, brilliant. +1 (and no, that doesnt make me a all climate change is man-made
gopher)
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Real talent</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/02/08/RealTalent.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-02-08T15:02:57+00:00</published>
    <updated>2010-02-08T15:02:54.0087348+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/hyc49DrIukY/1265358761">Microsoft
Confessions: 'Killed over politics'</a>.   
<p>
... The people that need to be cut at MS are the managers that don't support their
teams and only support their own careers .....<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bn/~4/hyc49DrIukY" width="1" height="1" /></p></i> [via <a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/hyc49DrIukY/1265358761">Betanews</a>]
</blockquote>
        <p>
In all my various incarnations being bossed by managers in Companies of any size
at all, I've only ever met one who didnt fit this description - the utterly insprirational
force that was behind Cellnet's early success (and its not the person who seems to
paint themselves as such in the media). IMHO, its a size and longevity issue
- there are more people who have only their own interests at heart than 'play for
the team' - the bigger you are, the longer you have been reliant on a particular product
the more you will hire them. Apple re-invents and re-cycles product to do more than
just keep screwing the consumers, its keeps Apple on its toes pretending its young
and vibrant and relevant.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Makes me weep</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/01/29/MakesMeWeep.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-01-29T18:19:08+00:00</published>
    <updated>2010-01-29T18:19:03.072951+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2010/01/the_best_produc/">The
best products sell them selves</a>. .... Ultimately, if you spend time creating
something that people want, they will do the job of marketing it for you</i> [via <a href="http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2010/01/the_best_produc/">Andy
Budd::Blogography Articles</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
two sage statements that have always struck me as obvious. But then why Twitter
is so popular among a particular class of people is a mystery to me. Oh well, cheer
up, its Friday. :-) BTW, my kids dont use twitter but use just about everything else
(that includes those I probably dont know about).
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Spotify</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/01/21/Spotify.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8.aspx</id>
    <published>2010-01-21T11:44:39+00:00</published>
    <updated>2010-01-21T11:44:38.1157127+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <p>
Like many of you out there, we’ve been perfectly happy with the free version of the
service. Over the last few months though, Spotify has added lots of new features to
the Premium offering. Having tried it out for a few weeks, we can say that it’s well
worth the monthly £9.99 if you’re a music fan.
</p>
          </i> [via <a href="http://review.techworld.com/applications/3209717/spotify-premium/?olo=rss">Spotify
Premium - Techworld.com</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Exactly and the rumour is that companies are struggling with the ad-model, revenue
is spread to thin .. Google is sucking up most of the air with very little left for
anyone else (a bad variant on the long-tail theory?) so the only way these services
are going to survive is subscription. If you want it, pay for it.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>being an icebox</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/12/09/beingAnIcebox.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a.aspx</id>
    <published>2009-12-09T16:54:13+00:00</published>
    <updated>2009-12-09T16:54:15.1308627+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <p>
I'm perfectly fine being anti-cool if it enables me to keep my family covered and
develop software that tons of people use.
</p>
          </i> [via <a href="http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2009/12/thinking-out-loud-what-should-i-learn-next.html">Nick
Bradbury</a>]
</blockquote>
        <p>
LOL, I like anti-cool, I'm probably anti-cool in the not being cool way - but hey
I know some really cool people :-D
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Journalism :-)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/12/09/Journalism.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3.aspx</id>
    <published>2009-12-09T12:12:38+00:00</published>
    <updated>2009-12-09T12:12:40.3473635+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>Journalism is apparently
no longer a requirement</i> [via <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/The-Black-Screen-Syndrome-or-Tech-news-in-search-of-the-apocalypse/1259875771/2">The
Black Screen Syndrome, or, Tech news in search of the apocalypse | Security News -
Betanews</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Oh I havent had a good ramble rant for ages and ages and ages .. the above link points
out the BBC's wonderful habit (it seems to me) of editing stories to cover up the
total hash/downright misinformation of some of its journalism. Its a poor defence
really isnt it - are we really meant to keep going back to articles to see what the
latest 'truth' is? Not fair to bash the good old Beeb really, they are all the same.
Tis my humble opinion that journalism hasnt changed much over the years but we
can now see the BBC changing its articles as its view of the 'truth of the matter'
changes - in bygone days, they broadcast a story and never the correction there would
be. Just the same in the printed media. IMHO of course. Its the seeing the changes
that is different, and its a good thing, though one wonders about the damage to the
brand that all the revisions make. end of ramble.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Muppets Bohemian Rhapsody</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/11/26/MuppetsBohemianRhapsody.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c.aspx</id>
    <published>2009-11-26T11:18:48+00:00</published>
    <updated>2009-11-26T11:18:51.6604467+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <div align="center">
            <embed height="385" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tgbNymZ7vqY&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent">
            </embed>
          </div>
          <p>
[via <a href="http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10923">forgetfoo.com - it's just a
pixel baby.</a>]
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
brightened my day.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>3D Mandelbrot</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/11/23/3DMandelbrot.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca.aspx</id>
    <published>2009-11-23T10:18:53+00:00</published>
    <updated>2009-11-23T10:18:53.7940181+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>What we have featured in
this article is a potential 3D version of the same fractal. For the impatient, you
can skip to the <a href="mc-zapf://host0/samples/iMunch/resources/munchermain.htm#renders">nice
pics</a>, but the below makes an interesting read (with a little math as well for
the curious).</i> [via <a href="http://www.skytopia.com/project/fractal/mandelbulb.html">Mandelbulb:
The Unravelling of the Real 3D Mandelbrot Fractal</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Gorgeous.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Welcome back</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/11/20/WelcomeBack.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd.aspx</id>
    <published>2009-11-20T15:18:18+00:00</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T15:18:17.815346+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">To all my regular readers a fond hello again
after a few months of not being bothered that this thing didnt work, even not noticed
that this thing didnt work and so i have slipped out off the google number one spot.
Now, test number 3 in a sequence of indeterminate number - will i make it back again?<img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd" /></div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Daft question</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2008/02/28/DaftQuestion.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-02-28T19:11:51+00:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-28T19:11:58.690744+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9881858-39.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-5">Is
public domain software open-source?</a>.</i> [via <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9881858-39.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-5">CNET
News.com</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Absolutely not, public domain has no license. Open source is encumbered by a restrictive
license. Period, end, move on. 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hiding VS Projects</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2008/02/22/HidingVSProjects.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-02-22T16:04:52+00:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-22T16:04:52.7910976+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/saraford/archive/2008/02/22/did-you-know-you-can-use-solution-folders-to-hide-projects-157.aspx">Did
you know... You can use Solution Folders to hide projects? - #157</a>.  ....<img height="1" src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7703453" width="1" /></i> [via <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/saraford/archive/2008/02/22/did-you-know-you-can-use-solution-folders-to-hide-projects-157.aspx">MSDN
Blogs</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Wonderful :-)
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Your moderne life belongs to?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2008/02/12/YourModerneLifeBelongsTo.aspx" />
    <id>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,adc9dd01-328f-4aaf-b9e2-8a2dfb64a33c.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-02-12T15:22:15+00:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-12T15:22:18.9323072+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete</name>
    </author>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Go read:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
            <i>
              <a href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/02/08/a_google_horror.html">a
google horror story: what happens when you are disappeared</a>.  
</i>
          </p>
          <p>
Earlier this week, an acquaintance of mine found himself trapped in a Kafka-esque
nightmare, a nightmare that should make all of us stop and think. ... [via <a href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/02/08/a_google_horror.html">apophenia</a>]
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
It seems being connected still counts for so much but I wonder how many 'real' people
are being bombed by this. How many people really are handing over their filofaxes
for someone else to keep, or more importantly, filofaxes they care about.
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=adc9dd01-328f-4aaf-b9e2-8a2dfb64a33c" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>