<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Pete Cole's WebLog</title>
    <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/</link>
    <description>Mutterings on things generally </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Peter Cole</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:02:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>weblog@profundis.co.uk</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>weblog@profundis.co.uk</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=c7843cab-24e1-4b49-8cf0-ff30f9d599f1</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,c7843cab-24e1-4b49-8cf0-ff30f9d599f1.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,c7843cab-24e1-4b49-8cf0-ff30f9d599f1.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c7843cab-24e1-4b49-8cf0-ff30f9d599f1</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>The rebuilt word processing
editor also offers ... tab stops, a ruler for adjusting margins, </i> [via <a href="http://news.techworld.com/applications/3220146/google-previews-new-google-docs-interface/?olo=rss">Google
previews new Google Docs interface - Techworld.com</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Do what? The Google word processor only now does tabs stops and rulers for adjusting
margins? I had the check the date and allegedly this isnt an April Fool article. wow.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=c7843cab-24e1-4b49-8cf0-ff30f9d599f1" />
      </body>
      <title>errr, hello, i am reading this in 2010 aren't I?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,c7843cab-24e1-4b49-8cf0-ff30f9d599f1.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/04/13/errrHelloIAmReadingThisIn2010ArentI.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:02:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;The rebuilt word processing editor also offers ... tab stops, a ruler
for adjusting margins, &lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://news.techworld.com/applications/3220146/google-previews-new-google-docs-interface/?olo=rss"&gt;Google
previews new Google Docs interface - Techworld.com&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Do what? The Google word processor only now does tabs stops and rulers for adjusting
margins? I had the check the date and allegedly this isnt an April Fool article. wow.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=c7843cab-24e1-4b49-8cf0-ff30f9d599f1" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,c7843cab-24e1-4b49-8cf0-ff30f9d599f1.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=897a6fbf-55a1-4cbf-a0e2-97d23cabee7f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,897a6fbf-55a1-4cbf-a0e2-97d23cabee7f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,897a6fbf-55a1-4cbf-a0e2-97d23cabee7f.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=897a6fbf-55a1-4cbf-a0e2-97d23cabee7f</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
May be I shouldnt reproduce this in full .. but having not really read the net for
a while its so good to come back to some sense ....
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
            <i>
              <a href="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2010/Apr-03.html">The Right Spirit</a>.
 
</i>
          </p>
          <p>
From Steve Jobs 1997 presentation when he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxOp5mBY9IY&amp;playnext_from=TL&amp;videos=QwD0UcvFFS4">announced
his partnership</a> with Microsoft: 
</p>
          <blockquote>Where we are right now is, we are shepherding some of the greatest
assets in the computer industry. 
<p>
If we want to move forward, seeing Apple helping an prospering again. 
</p><p><b>We have to let go of this notion that for Apple to win, Microsoft has to lose.
We have to embrace the notion that for Apple to win, Apple has to do a really good
job. And if others are going to help us, that's great. Because we need all the help
we can get. And if we screw up and do not do a good job, it is not somebody else's
fault, it is our fault.</b></p><p>
So I think that is a very important discussion. 
</p><p>
If we want Microsoft office on the Mac, we better treat the company that puts it out
with a little bit of gratitude. We like their software. 
</p><p>
So the era of setting this up as a competition between Apple and Microsoft is over
as far as I am concerned. This is about getting Apple healthy and this is about Apple
being able to make incredibly great contributions to the industry and get healthy
and prosper again. 
</p></blockquote>
          <p>
I feel exactly this way about open source. For open source to win, we do not need
Microsoft, Apple or proprietary software to lose. The industry is not a zero-sum game,
not only we enrich each other's platforms by exploring different ideas, but it is
also incredibly healthy for the industry to have a blend of different approaches to
computing. 
</p>
          <p>
Open source software leads in some areas in the industry and we as a community are
very proud of its success. But when it comes to the areas where open source has not
delivered a full solution like our proprietary competitors have, we resort to finger
pointing and blaming others. 
</p>
          <p>
Some in the open source movement would like all the software in the industry to be
open source/free software. Desktops, servers, games, embedded systems and everything
that every human touches. 
</p>
          <p>
Although it is a noble goal, it has set people up for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Noble_Truths">suffering</a> by
making the goal unachievable. It has been 15 years since the rise of the first large
open source companies and by now we should know that our dream of a pure open source
stack ruling the world is not going to happen any decade now. 
</p>
          <p>
Luckily, today, we have a much better understanding of where open source works and
where it does not. 
</p>
          <p>
It would do us good to ponder Steve's 1997 message: 
</p>
          <blockquote>
            <b>And if others are going to help us, that's great. Because we need
all the help we can get. And if we screw up and do not do a good job, it is not somebody
else's fault, it is our fault.</b>
          </blockquote>
          <p>
Once again, I want to recommend Ben Zander's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0142001104?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=tiraniaorg-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0142001104">The
Art of Possibility</a> book, a book with various recipes on how to look at the world
through new eyes.
</p>
 [via <a href="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2010/Apr-03.html">Miguel de Icaza</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
I was talking at Christmas time with someone who has influence on platform developments
and directions, talking about being proprietory and being open and being encouraging
and well all sorts of stuff which I failed to accurately summarise as "stop thinking
only you should win will you". At this time, same goes for politics too -- this 2010
election campaign is so depressing already and its only a week old.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=897a6fbf-55a1-4cbf-a0e2-97d23cabee7f" />
      </body>
      <title>OMG, sense prevails </title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,897a6fbf-55a1-4cbf-a0e2-97d23cabee7f.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/04/13/OMGSensePrevails.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:48:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
May be I shouldnt reproduce this in full .. but having not really read the net for
a while its so good to come back to some sense ....
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2010/Apr-03.html"&gt;The Right Spirit&lt;/a&gt;.
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
From Steve Jobs 1997 presentation when he &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxOp5mBY9IY&amp;amp;playnext_from=TL&amp;amp;videos=QwD0UcvFFS4"&gt;announced
his partnership&lt;/a&gt; with Microsoft: &lt;blockquote&gt;Where we are right now is, we are
shepherding some of the greatest assets in the computer industry. 
&lt;p&gt;
If we want to move forward, seeing Apple helping an prospering again. 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;We have to let go of this notion that for Apple to win, Microsoft has to lose.
We have to embrace the notion that for Apple to win, Apple has to do a really good
job. And if others are going to help us, that's great. Because we need all the help
we can get. And if we screw up and do not do a good job, it is not somebody else's
fault, it is our fault.&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
So I think that is a very important discussion. 
&lt;p&gt;
If we want Microsoft office on the Mac, we better treat the company that puts it out
with a little bit of gratitude. We like their software. 
&lt;p&gt;
So the era of setting this up as a competition between Apple and Microsoft is over
as far as I am concerned. This is about getting Apple healthy and this is about Apple
being able to make incredibly great contributions to the industry and get healthy
and prosper again. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
I feel exactly this way about open source. For open source to win, we do not need
Microsoft, Apple or proprietary software to lose. The industry is not a zero-sum game,
not only we enrich each other's platforms by exploring different ideas, but it is
also incredibly healthy for the industry to have a blend of different approaches to
computing. 
&lt;p&gt;
Open source software leads in some areas in the industry and we as a community are
very proud of its success. But when it comes to the areas where open source has not
delivered a full solution like our proprietary competitors have, we resort to finger
pointing and blaming others. 
&lt;p&gt;
Some in the open source movement would like all the software in the industry to be
open source/free software. Desktops, servers, games, embedded systems and everything
that every human touches. 
&lt;p&gt;
Although it is a noble goal, it has set people up for &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Noble_Truths"&gt;suffering&lt;/a&gt; by
making the goal unachievable. It has been 15 years since the rise of the first large
open source companies and by now we should know that our dream of a pure open source
stack ruling the world is not going to happen any decade now. 
&lt;p&gt;
Luckily, today, we have a much better understanding of where open source works and
where it does not. 
&lt;p&gt;
It would do us good to ponder Steve's 1997 message: &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;And if others are
going to help us, that's great. Because we need all the help we can get. And if we
screw up and do not do a good job, it is not somebody else's fault, it is our fault.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Once again, I want to recommend Ben Zander's &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0142001104?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=tiraniaorg-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=390957&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0142001104"&gt;The
Art of Possibility&lt;/a&gt; book, a book with various recipes on how to look at the world
through new eyes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2010/Apr-03.html"&gt;Miguel de Icaza&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
I was talking at Christmas time with someone who has influence on platform developments
and directions, talking about being proprietory and being open and being encouraging
and well all sorts of stuff which I failed to accurately summarise as "stop thinking
only you should win will you". At this time, same goes for politics too -- this 2010
election campaign is so depressing already and its only a week old.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=897a6fbf-55a1-4cbf-a0e2-97d23cabee7f" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,897a6fbf-55a1-4cbf-a0e2-97d23cabee7f.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=966c9e62-69e3-41e6-92b5-c027ec3503c3</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,966c9e62-69e3-41e6-92b5-c027ec3503c3.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,966c9e62-69e3-41e6-92b5-c027ec3503c3.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=966c9e62-69e3-41e6-92b5-c027ec3503c3</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <p>
To which Jobs responded: "We've been there before, and intermediate layers between
the platform and the developer ultimately produces sub-standard apps and hinders the
progress of the platform."
</p>
          </i> [via <a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/eFzy211xw1A/1271089363">Betanews</a>]
</blockquote>
        <p>
+1, lol.com (pretending to be young, hip etc etc.)
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=966c9e62-69e3-41e6-92b5-c027ec3503c3" />
      </body>
      <title>The old folks bite back  (aka Apple's 3.3.1 axe)</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,966c9e62-69e3-41e6-92b5-c027ec3503c3.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/04/13/TheOldFolksBiteBackAkaApples331Axe.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
To which Jobs responded: "We've been there before, and intermediate layers between
the platform and the developer ultimately produces sub-standard apps and hinders the
progress of the platform."
&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/eFzy211xw1A/1271089363"&gt;Betanews&lt;/a&gt;]&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
+1, lol.com (pretending to be young, hip etc etc.)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=966c9e62-69e3-41e6-92b5-c027ec3503c3" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,966c9e62-69e3-41e6-92b5-c027ec3503c3.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/QObtlwJkwPI/1265325915">Boxee:
We didn't steal anything from Hulu</a>.   
<p>
By <a href="http://www.betanews.com/author/smfulton3">Scott M. Fulton, III</a>, <a href="http://www.betanews.com/">Betanews</a></p><p>
.. Zucker responded: "What Boxee was doing was illegally taking the content that was
on Hulu without any business deal. We have several distributors...of the Hulu content
that we have legal distribution deals with, so we don't preclude distribution deals.
What we preclude are those that illegally take that content."
</p><p>
That accusation before Congress that Boxee violated the law triggered <a href="http://blog.boxee.tv/2010/02/04/boxee-responds-to-nbcs-jeff-zucker/" target="_blank">a
lengthy response late this afternoon</a> from Boxee Founder and CEO Avner Ronen, on
his company's blog: "Boxee uses a web browser to access Hulu's content -- just like
Firefox or Internet Explorer. Boxee users click on a link to Hulu's Web site and the
video within that page plays. We don't 'take' the video. We don't copy it. We don't
put ads on top of it. The video and the ads play like they do on other browsers or
on Hulu Desktop. And it certainly is legal to do so."
</p><p>
The question of whether enabling access to another Web site's video through one's
software is effectively "redistribution," cuts to the heart of the major issue of
contention surrounding the ... <a href="http://www.betanews.com/">Copyright Betanews,
Inc. 2010</a><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bn/~4/QObtlwJkwPI" width="1" height="1" /></p></i> [via <a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/QObtlwJkwPI/1265325915">Betanews</a>]
</blockquote>
        <p>
Surrounding quite a lot in the media world. It seems to me that they are all absolutely
desparate to control the 'frame', not just what is displayed in that frame (which
is the bit they have the rights too). 
</p>
        <p>
This is what the row in the UK about project Canvas is about -- the BBC saying they
are being open and wonderful and generally terrific (I know, I know) and Sky and Virgin
(platform providers) being very suspicious about why the BBC of all organisations
should want to build a platform.
</p>
        <p>
My opinion? Everyone is terrified that in the future (or already) content is worthless,
its only the frame (where the adverts sit) that is monetisable. Certainly in
the UK we need to come to a better settlement or we are stuck in a world of almost
zero viewer competion. Do you really want a world where you can only buy one TV set? 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269" />
      </body>
      <title>What is content, what is distribution</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/02/08/WhatIsContentWhatIsDistribution.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:47:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/QObtlwJkwPI/1265325915"&gt;Boxee:
We didn't steal anything from Hulu&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp; 
&lt;p&gt;
By &lt;a href="http://www.betanews.com/author/smfulton3"&gt;Scott M. Fulton, III&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.betanews.com/"&gt;Betanews&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
.. Zucker responded: "What Boxee was doing was illegally taking the content that was
on Hulu without any business deal. We have several distributors...of the Hulu content
that we have legal distribution deals with, so we don't preclude distribution deals.
What we preclude are those that illegally take that content."
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
That accusation before Congress that Boxee violated the law triggered &lt;a href="http://blog.boxee.tv/2010/02/04/boxee-responds-to-nbcs-jeff-zucker/" target=_blank&gt;a
lengthy response late this afternoon&lt;/a&gt; from Boxee Founder and CEO Avner Ronen, on
his company's blog: "Boxee uses a web browser to access Hulu's content -- just like
Firefox or Internet Explorer. Boxee users click on a link to Hulu's Web site and the
video within that page plays. We don't 'take' the video. We don't copy it. We don't
put ads on top of it. The video and the ads play like they do on other browsers or
on Hulu Desktop. And it certainly is legal to do so."
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The question of whether enabling access to another Web site's video through one's
software is effectively "redistribution," cuts to the heart of the major issue of
contention surrounding the ... &lt;a href="http://www.betanews.com/"&gt;Copyright Betanews,
Inc. 2010&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bn/~4/QObtlwJkwPI" width=1 height=1&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/QObtlwJkwPI/1265325915"&gt;Betanews&lt;/a&gt;]&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Surrounding quite a lot in the media world. It seems to me that they are all absolutely
desparate to control the 'frame', not just what is displayed in that frame (which
is the bit they have the rights too). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is what the row in the UK about project Canvas is about -- the BBC saying they
are being open and wonderful and generally terrific (I know, I know) and Sky and Virgin
(platform providers) being very suspicious about why the BBC of all organisations
should want to build a platform.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
My opinion? Everyone is terrified that in the future (or already) content is worthless,
its only the frame (where the adverts sit) that is&amp;nbsp;monetisable. Certainly in
the UK we need to come to a better settlement or we are stuck in a world of almost
zero viewer competion. Do you really want a world where you can only buy one TV set?&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,5ca8053f-281e-46ab-839d-096777c83269.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
... idea Grommit
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
            <i>The Turbine Light concept (which is going to be a part of the upcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/greener+gadgets">Greener
Gadgets conference</a> in New York City at the end of this month) harnesses the power
of the wind from cars rushing past to light up the ever-darkening roadways. The turbines
use the wind collected to generate energy for the lighting</i> [via <a href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/mElffjh-0rg/">Engadget</a>]
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
fab idea, brilliant. +1 (and no, that doesnt make me a all climate change is man-made
gopher)
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770" />
      </body>
      <title>Cracking ...</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/02/08/Cracking.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:23:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
... idea Grommit
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;The Turbine Light concept (which is going to be a part of the upcoming &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/greener+gadgets"&gt;Greener
Gadgets conference&lt;/a&gt; in New York City at the end of this month) harnesses the power
of the wind from cars rushing past to light up the ever-darkening roadways. The turbines
use the wind collected to generate energy for the lighting&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/mElffjh-0rg/"&gt;Engadget&lt;/a&gt;]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
fab idea, brilliant. +1 (and no, that doesnt make me a all climate change is man-made
gopher)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,995b1197-8167-4aae-9c17-50c1cca57770.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/hyc49DrIukY/1265358761">Microsoft
Confessions: 'Killed over politics'</a>.   
<p>
... The people that need to be cut at MS are the managers that don't support their
teams and only support their own careers .....<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bn/~4/hyc49DrIukY" width="1" height="1" /></p></i> [via <a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/hyc49DrIukY/1265358761">Betanews</a>]
</blockquote>
        <p>
In all my various incarnations being bossed by managers in Companies of any size
at all, I've only ever met one who didnt fit this description - the utterly insprirational
force that was behind Cellnet's early success (and its not the person who seems to
paint themselves as such in the media). IMHO, its a size and longevity issue
- there are more people who have only their own interests at heart than 'play for
the team' - the bigger you are, the longer you have been reliant on a particular product
the more you will hire them. Apple re-invents and re-cycles product to do more than
just keep screwing the consumers, its keeps Apple on its toes pretending its young
and vibrant and relevant.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5" />
      </body>
      <title>Real talent</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/02/08/RealTalent.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/hyc49DrIukY/1265358761"&gt;Microsoft
Confessions: 'Killed over politics'&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;p&gt;
... The people that need to be cut at MS are the managers that don't support their
teams and only support their own careers .....&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bn/~4/hyc49DrIukY" width=1 height=1&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/hyc49DrIukY/1265358761"&gt;Betanews&lt;/a&gt;]&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
In all my various&amp;nbsp;incarnations being bossed by managers in Companies of any size
at all, I've only ever met one who didnt fit this description - the utterly insprirational
force that was behind Cellnet's early success (and its not the person who seems to
paint themselves as such in the media). IMHO, its a&amp;nbsp;size and longevity issue
- there are more people who have only their own interests at heart than 'play for
the team' - the bigger you are, the longer you have been reliant on a particular product
the more you will hire them. Apple re-invents and re-cycles product to do more than
just keep screwing the consumers, its keeps Apple on its toes pretending its young
and vibrant and relevant.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,a441dcdf-1fec-47b6-b89e-82e75fa387f5.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2010/01/the_best_produc/">The
best products sell them selves</a>. .... Ultimately, if you spend time creating
something that people want, they will do the job of marketing it for you</i> [via <a href="http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2010/01/the_best_produc/">Andy
Budd::Blogography Articles</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
two sage statements that have always struck me as obvious. But then why Twitter
is so popular among a particular class of people is a mystery to me. Oh well, cheer
up, its Friday. :-) BTW, my kids dont use twitter but use just about everything else
(that includes those I probably dont know about).
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09" />
      </body>
      <title>Makes me weep</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/01/29/MakesMeWeep.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:19:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2010/01/the_best_produc/"&gt;The
best products sell them selves&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;....&amp;nbsp;Ultimately, if you spend time creating
something that people want, they will do the job of marketing it for you&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2010/01/the_best_produc/"&gt;Andy
Budd::Blogography Articles&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
two sage statements that have always struck me as&amp;nbsp;obvious. But then why&amp;nbsp;Twitter
is so popular among a particular class of people is a mystery to me. Oh well, cheer
up, its Friday. :-) BTW, my kids dont use twitter but use just about everything else
(that includes those I probably dont know about).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,cd4eda79-99fa-40be-8dc5-2f6299dc3b09.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <p>
Like many of you out there, we’ve been perfectly happy with the free version of the
service. Over the last few months though, Spotify has added lots of new features to
the Premium offering. Having tried it out for a few weeks, we can say that it’s well
worth the monthly £9.99 if you’re a music fan.
</p>
          </i> [via <a href="http://review.techworld.com/applications/3209717/spotify-premium/?olo=rss">Spotify
Premium - Techworld.com</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Exactly and the rumour is that companies are struggling with the ad-model, revenue
is spread to thin .. Google is sucking up most of the air with very little left for
anyone else (a bad variant on the long-tail theory?) so the only way these services
are going to survive is subscription. If you want it, pay for it.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8" />
      </body>
      <title>Spotify</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2010/01/21/Spotify.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Like many of you out there, we’ve been perfectly happy with the free version of the
service. Over the last few months though, Spotify has added lots of new features to
the Premium offering. Having tried it out for a few weeks, we can say that it’s well
worth the monthly £9.99 if you’re a music fan.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://review.techworld.com/applications/3209717/spotify-premium/?olo=rss"&gt;Spotify
Premium - Techworld.com&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Exactly and the rumour is that companies are struggling with the ad-model, revenue
is spread to thin .. Google is sucking up most of the air with very little left for
anyone else (a bad variant on the long-tail theory?) so the only way these services
are going to survive is subscription. If you want it, pay for it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,1cc78f43-da0d-4cb8-82e7-aa39ea5687d8.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <p>
I'm perfectly fine being anti-cool if it enables me to keep my family covered and
develop software that tons of people use.
</p>
          </i> [via <a href="http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2009/12/thinking-out-loud-what-should-i-learn-next.html">Nick
Bradbury</a>]
</blockquote>
        <p>
LOL, I like anti-cool, I'm probably anti-cool in the not being cool way - but hey
I know some really cool people :-D
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a" />
      </body>
      <title>being an icebox</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/12/09/beingAnIcebox.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:54:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
I'm perfectly fine being anti-cool if it enables me to keep my family covered and
develop software that tons of people use.
&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2009/12/thinking-out-loud-what-should-i-learn-next.html"&gt;Nick
Bradbury&lt;/a&gt;]&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
LOL, I like anti-cool, I'm probably anti-cool in the not being cool way - but hey
I know some really cool people :-D
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,75fd577f-7b57-49e8-8e36-95dff00ab47a.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>Journalism is apparently
no longer a requirement</i> [via <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/The-Black-Screen-Syndrome-or-Tech-news-in-search-of-the-apocalypse/1259875771/2">The
Black Screen Syndrome, or, Tech news in search of the apocalypse | Security News -
Betanews</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Oh I havent had a good ramble rant for ages and ages and ages .. the above link points
out the BBC's wonderful habit (it seems to me) of editing stories to cover up the
total hash/downright misinformation of some of its journalism. Its a poor defence
really isnt it - are we really meant to keep going back to articles to see what the
latest 'truth' is? Not fair to bash the good old Beeb really, they are all the same.
Tis my humble opinion that journalism hasnt changed much over the years but we
can now see the BBC changing its articles as its view of the 'truth of the matter'
changes - in bygone days, they broadcast a story and never the correction there would
be. Just the same in the printed media. IMHO of course. Its the seeing the changes
that is different, and its a good thing, though one wonders about the damage to the
brand that all the revisions make. end of ramble.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3" />
      </body>
      <title>Journalism :-)</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/12/09/Journalism.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Journalism is apparently no longer a requirement&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/The-Black-Screen-Syndrome-or-Tech-news-in-search-of-the-apocalypse/1259875771/2"&gt;The
Black Screen Syndrome, or, Tech news in search of the apocalypse | Security News -
Betanews&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Oh I havent had a good ramble rant for ages and ages and ages .. the above link points
out the BBC's wonderful habit (it seems to me) of editing stories to cover up the
total hash/downright misinformation of some of its journalism. Its a poor defence
really isnt it - are we really meant to keep going back to articles to see what the
latest 'truth' is? Not fair to bash the good old Beeb really, they are all the same.
Tis my humble opinion that journalism hasnt changed much over the years&amp;nbsp;but we
can now see the BBC changing its articles as its view of the 'truth of the matter'
changes - in bygone days, they broadcast a story and never the correction there would
be. Just the same in the printed media. IMHO of course. Its the seeing the changes
that is different, and its a good thing, though one wonders about the damage to the
brand that all the revisions make. end of ramble.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,2efdce80-3efc-4208-8e59-fbc2f4c95ca3.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <div align="center">
            <embed height="385" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tgbNymZ7vqY&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent">
            </embed>
          </div>
          <p>
[via <a href="http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10923">forgetfoo.com - it's just a
pixel baby.</a>]
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
brightened my day.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c" />
      </body>
      <title>Muppets Bohemian Rhapsody</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/11/26/MuppetsBohemianRhapsody.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:18:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;div align=center&gt;&lt;embed height=385 type=application/x-shockwave-flash width=640 src=http://www.youtube.com/v/tgbNymZ7vqY&amp;amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;amp; allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&gt;[via &lt;a href="http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=10923"&gt;forgetfoo.com - it's just a
pixel baby.&lt;/a&gt;]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
brightened my day.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,cb573860-4572-4d41-b6bc-b1a369269b2c.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>What we have featured in
this article is a potential 3D version of the same fractal. For the impatient, you
can skip to the <a href="mc-zapf://host0/samples/iMunch/resources/munchermain.htm#renders">nice
pics</a>, but the below makes an interesting read (with a little math as well for
the curious).</i> [via <a href="http://www.skytopia.com/project/fractal/mandelbulb.html">Mandelbulb:
The Unravelling of the Real 3D Mandelbrot Fractal</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Gorgeous.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca" />
      </body>
      <title>3D Mandelbrot</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/11/23/3DMandelbrot.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;What we have featured in this article is a potential 3D version of
the same fractal. For the impatient, you can skip to the &lt;a href="mc-zapf://host0/samples/iMunch/resources/munchermain.htm#renders"&gt;nice
pics&lt;/a&gt;, but the below makes an interesting read (with a little math as well for
the curious).&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://www.skytopia.com/project/fractal/mandelbulb.html"&gt;Mandelbulb:
The Unravelling of the Real 3D Mandelbrot Fractal&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Gorgeous.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,2b28b93d-33d4-404b-9aa2-da57af1042ca.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">To all my regular readers a fond hello
again after a few months of not being bothered that this thing didnt work, even not
noticed that this thing didnt work and so i have slipped out off the google number
one spot. Now, test number 3 in a sequence of indeterminate number - will i make it
back again?<img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd" /></body>
      <title>Welcome back</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2009/11/20/WelcomeBack.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:18:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>To all my regular readers a fond hello again after a few months of not being bothered that this thing didnt work, even not noticed that this thing didnt work and so i have slipped out off the google number one spot. Now, test number 3 in a sequence of indeterminate number - will i make it back again?&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,4317b157-5643-45d7-96ac-3f7f76f712bd.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9881858-39.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-5">Is
public domain software open-source?</a>.</i> [via <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9881858-39.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-5">CNET
News.com</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Absolutely not, public domain has no license. Open source is encumbered by a restrictive
license. Period, end, move on. 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c" />
      </body>
      <title>Daft question</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2008/02/28/DaftQuestion.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:11:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9881858-39.html?part=rss&amp;amp;subj=news&amp;amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-5"&gt;Is
public domain software open-source?&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9881858-39.html?part=rss&amp;amp;subj=news&amp;amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-5"&gt;CNET
News.com&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Absolutely not, public domain has no license. Open source is encumbered by a restrictive
license. Period, end,&amp;nbsp;move on. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,aff17826-cdd5-432c-8bd7-5f663fedcd7c.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <i>
            <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/saraford/archive/2008/02/22/did-you-know-you-can-use-solution-folders-to-hide-projects-157.aspx">Did
you know... You can use Solution Folders to hide projects? - #157</a>.  ....<img height="1" src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7703453" width="1" /></i> [via <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/saraford/archive/2008/02/22/did-you-know-you-can-use-solution-folders-to-hide-projects-157.aspx">MSDN
Blogs</a>]</blockquote>
        <p>
Wonderful :-)
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e" />
      </body>
      <title>Hiding VS Projects</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/PermaLink,guid,52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/2008/02/22/HidingVSProjects.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:04:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/saraford/archive/2008/02/22/did-you-know-you-can-use-solution-folders-to-hide-projects-157.aspx"&gt;Did
you know... You can use Solution Folders to hide projects? - #157&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;....&lt;img height=1 src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7703453" width=1&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;[via &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/saraford/archive/2008/02/22/did-you-know-you-can-use-solution-folders-to-hide-projects-157.aspx"&gt;MSDN
Blogs&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Wonderful :-)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/aggbug.ashx?id=52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.profundis.co.uk/peteblog/CommentView,guid,52f2175f-07f7-413b-a298-202883a3a06e.aspx</comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>