MSN Search supports RSS. This is very cool, and it's a differentiator for their search service because Google doesn't do it, nor does Yahoo, Jeeves, etc. It's also nice because they listened to us at the design review meeting late last year in Redmond. It was nearly unanimous among the bloggers that RSS support should be part of the search engine, both on the sending and receiving sides. Now one half has been taken care of. I'm sure this feature will gain wide use among bloggers. Very good. [via Scripting News]
Back last year I wrote this:
I had an idea - search results as rss feeds. I know that services like technorati do this but I wasn't aware that you could do it with things like Google and to my amazement there does seem to be little in this space. I found GoogleAlerts (www.googlealerts.com), who are not affiliated to Google and Google Web/News alerts (e.g. http://www.google.com/webalerts, but they don't do rss) there also seems to be a way to do it on yahoo but not particularly public. Obviously one might fear that all Google have to do is add rss to their service and bam you're stuffed but Google seem to be spraying stuff around and keeping them in beta for ages - not clear what their strategy is. It is interesting that Googlealerts are using the Google api and Google have given them an 'unlimited' use key. There is always space for competitors with a better variation on service.
I then went on to say:
Plain search results as rss is not that interesting - its what you can do on top of this that becomes more interesting, for example bayesian analysis of 'this result is interesting' to come up with more stuff that is intersting, aggregated ratings of results to come up with more stuff that is interesting (this is the sort of area I was into with my Profundis search thing from years ago). Googlealerts does some of this stuff but I think there is room for more innovation.
While there doesn't seem to be much innovation yet I suspect that search is going to move beyond the type text in input box, wade through 4,260,000 results (.33 seconds) we have all got to know and love. Google et al are good, but it is still too much work when you are looking for more than an 'I'm feeling lucky' result. Aggregators are going to become more than just the display of RSS feeds.